|
|
Home > P5:Pubic Hair - male |
|
Proposition 5: (Pubic Hair - male) (please scroll down)
|
Proposition number 5: It is a violation of Community Standards for a man to have exposed pubic hair at a public beach.
Summary: {‘for’ the proposition wins. If we exclude the ‘no rule’ category, of the 78 Eligible voters who voted agreement or disagreement, 73% voted against allowing males to expose pubic hair (±11.1%, 19 times out of 20).}
|
|
Score: (Agreement Votes: ‘No Rule’ Votes: Disagreement Votes) |
Agreement:Disagreement Ratio
|
Judgment:
(for or against the proposition) |
|
All eligible Voters |
57:25:21 |
2.7:1 |
for |
|
eligible Males |
26:9:9 |
2.9:1 |
for |
|
eligible Females |
29:16:12 |
2.4:1 |
for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All non-eligible Voters |
13:5:11 |
1.2:1 |
for |
|
Teen Females |
8:3:2 |
4:1 |
for |
|
All non-Resident Voters |
5:2:4 |
1:1 |
for |
|
non-resident Males |
2:0:3 |
1:1.5 |
against |
|
non-resident Female
|
3:2:1 |
2:1 |
for |
Details:
|
|
Number of Votes |
Number of Voters |
Number of Abstainers |
||||
|
All eligible Voters |
29 |
28 |
25 |
9 |
12 |
103 |
5 |
|
eligible Males |
14 |
12 |
9 |
4 |
5 |
44 |
1 |
|
eligible Females |
14 |
15 |
16 |
5 |
7 |
57 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All non-eligible Voters |
8 |
5 |
5 |
9 |
2 |
29 |
0 |
|
Teen Females |
6 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
|
All non- Voters |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
|
non-resident Males |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
|
non-resident Females |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
No Rule |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|
|
|
Of 103 Eligible Voters who voted: |
|
|
55%
|
against allowing males to expose pubic hair |
|
20% |
for |
|
24% |
voted ‘No Rule’ (i.e. status quo) |
|
If we exclude the ‘no rule’ category: of the 78 Eligible voters who voted agreement or disagreement: |
|
|
73% (±11.1%, 19 times out of 20) |
against allowing males to expose pubic hair |
|
27% |
|
Graph 5A
Graph
5B
Discussion of Results for Proposition Number 5: (Pubic Hair-male):
The ‘for’ side wins decisively. Both eligible males and eligible females voted on the same side. Males voted with a higher ‘agreement:disagreement’ ratio (2.9:1) than female voters (2.4:1). Teen females were 4:1 ‘for’ the proposition.
Voter Comments Section:
Community Standards Vote 2008
Ifs/ands/buts/comments on the following proposition: 5. It is a violation of Community Standards for a man to have exposed pubic hair at a public beach.
[Comments are typed as the various authors wrote them with no correction of spelling or editing. Editors notes are placed within square brackets.]
[legend: M=male, F=female, number is age, X=not specified.]
|
1. |
F40s |
Define “pubic hair” – does this indicat that genitals are also partially exposed? Some men are more husute [? illegable] than others – sorry this question is too vague for me to answer. |
|
2. |
M40s |
Men have pubic hair everywhere. |
|
3. |
F30s |
It’s against the law! |
|
4. |
M30s |
Define “pubic hair”. A man’s “treasure trail” can muddy the waters here. How about “X” inches below the navel. |
|
5. |
F20-25 |
Gross! |
|
6. |
F20-25 |
Not appropriate, nobody wants to see that. |
|
7. |
M20-25 |
If its exposing mans privates then yes. |
|
8. |
F20 |
Gross! |
-end of Proposition 5-
Home | Executive Summary | Site Map | Links