![]() |
Home > P15:Topless Woman |
Home |
Proposition 15 : (Topless Woman) (please scroll down)
|
Proposition number 15: It is a violation of Community Standards for a woman to be topless at a public beach.
Summary: { ‘agreement’ wins, therefore the proposition is decreed as written. If we exclude the ‘no rule’ category, of the 81 Eligible Voters who voted agreement or disagreement, 62% voted against a woman being topless on an undesignated public beach (±10.9%, 19 times out of 20).}
|
Score: (Agreement Votes: ‘No Rule’ Votes: Disagreement Votes)
|
Agreement:Disagreement Ratio
|
Judgment:
(for or against the proposition) |
All eligible Voters |
50:13:31 |
1.6:1 |
for |
eligible Males |
16:5:18 |
1:1.1 |
against |
eligible Females |
33:8:13 |
2.5:1 |
for |
|
|
|
|
All non-eligible |
19:4:5 |
3.8:1 |
for |
Teen Females |
12:1:0 |
12:0 |
for |
All non-resident |
4:3:4 |
1:1 |
tie between ‘for’ and ‘against’ |
non-resident Males |
0:2:3 |
0:3 |
against |
non-resident Female
|
4:1:1 |
4:1 |
for |
Details:
|
Number of Votes |
Number of Voters |
Number of Abstainers |
||||
All eligible Voters |
21 |
29 |
13 |
11 |
20 |
94 |
13 |
eligible Males |
7 |
9 |
5 |
7 |
11 |
39 |
6 |
eligible Females |
14 |
19 |
8 |
4 |
9 |
54 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All non-eligible Voters |
12 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
28 |
1 |
Teen Females |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
All non-resident Voters |
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
0 |
non-resident Males |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
non-resident Females |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
|
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
No Rule |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|
|
Of the 94 Eligible Voters who voted: |
|
53%
|
against a woman being topless on an undesignated public beach |
33% |
for |
14% |
voted ‘No Rule’ (i.e. status quo) |
If we exclude the ‘no rule’ category: of the 81 Eligible Voters who voted agreement or disagreement: |
|
62% (±10.9%, 19 times out of 20) |
against a woman being topless on an undesignated public beach |
38% |
for |
Graph 15A
Graph 15B
Graph 15C
Calculation of Margin of Error:
Results:
For women being topless at a beach: 31 votes
No Rule: 13 votes
Against women being topless: 50 votes
Comparing the ‘for’ and ‘against’ votes:
For: 31 votes±10.9%= 31 votes ±3.4 votes = a range of 27.6 to 34.4
Against: 50 votes±10.9%= 50 votes±5.5 votes = 44.5 to 55.5
Because the two ranges do not overlap, the difference in the two numbers is statistically significant.
Overall calculation of error:
for: 50±10.1%=50±5.1= a range of 44.9 to 55.1
no rule: 13±10.1%=13±1.3= a range of 11.7 to 14.3
against: 31±10.1%=31±3.1= a range of 27.9 to 34.1
Because the ranges do not overlap, the results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (i.e. 19 times out of 20). If a vote of the general Community were to be taken, we would expect a majority to vote in favour of the proposition.
Discussion of Results for Proposition Number 15: topless woman:
Fifty out of 94 voters, (53%), sided ‘for’ the proposition that stated: it is a violation of Community Standards for a woman to be topless at a public beach. Thirty three percent voted against the proposition. The people, therefore, have enacted the proposition as stated.
Eligible males voted mildly against (1.1:1), the proposition, (as did non-resident males), but eligible females voted in much larger numbers ‘for’ the proposition (2.5:1), more than enough to steer the final result in their direction. In fact, eligible females voted more than twice the rate ‘for’ the proposition as males voted ‘against’. Teen females voted in favour of the proposition (12:0), almost five times the rate of the eligible females. The Teen Females would have been unanimous except for one teen female who voted ‘no rule’.
Graph 15C shows an age effect in the pattern of voting. This graph shows the fraction of female voters who voted ‘for’ the proposition as a percentage of the total number of female voters in each age category. In this graph, series one gives the ‘strongly agree’ vote double weight to demonstrate how the younger females voted ‘strongly agree’ more frequently than the older voters. Females in the age range of 20-30 appear to be the more liberal group when it comes to tops-free.
Voters Comments Section:
Community Standards Vote 2008
Ifs/ands/buts/comments on the following proposition: 15. It is a violation of Community Standards for a woman to be topless at a public beach. Define ‘woman’ in the above question (in terms of age or stage of development):__________________________.
[Comments are typed as the various authors wrote them with no correction of spelling or editing. Editors notes are placed within square brackets.]
[legend: M=male, F=female, number is age, X=not specified.]
1. |
F17 |
Go to a nude beach! |
2. |
F17 |
Doesn’t matter. |
3. |
F40s |
It is the law of Alberta. |
4. |
F50s |
Shouldn’t be nude at beach. |
5. |
M40s |
Two many perverts around. |
6. |
F40s |
If she is brave enough let her! |
7. |
M30s |
Men are allowed to be topless so it would be sexist to not allow women the same freedom. |
8. |
F20-25 |
Unless its a nude beach. [she voted: agree] |
9. |
F30s |
Create such designated areas. |
10. |
F20-25 |
Love it. Wish I could. [she voted: no rule] |
11. |
M20-25 |
If its on a public beach that is used by familys and such, but if its made private then its ok. [he voted: agree] |
12. |
F19 |
Save that for a topless or nude beach. |
13. |
F20-25 |
Unless its a nudist beach. [she voted: strongly agree] |
14. |
F60 |
There should be no women of any age at public beaches be topless. |
15. |
M30 |
Public beach are for everyone/semi-nude or nude is for just that. |
-end of proposition 15-
Home | Short Summary | Site Map | Links