Home > P17f: Chances of Getting Laid

Home

Executive Summary

Short Summary: Just the Rules

Hot-button Issues Table

Site Map

 

Proposition 17f:

(Chances of Getting Laid)

(please scroll down)

 

 

Proposition 17f: If Sylvan Lake Public swimming areas became ‘tops optional’, the consequences would be: improved chances of getting laid, reduced chances of getting laid, or no change.

 

 

Summary:{‘Reduced chance of getting laid’ loses. There is no statistical difference between ‘Improved chance’ and ‘No change’. If we exclude the ‘no change’ category, of the 62 people who voted Improved Chances or Reduced Chances, 98% voted ‘Improved Chances of getting laid’.}

 

Summary:

 

Score:

(‘Improved chance’:

‘no change’:

‘Reduced chance’)

‘Improved chance’:’no change’ ratio

 

 

‘Improved

Chance’:

‘Reduced

Chance’

ratio

All Voters

61:51:1

1.27:1

improved

61:1

All Males

24:21:0

1.1:1

improved

24:0

All Females

37:28:1

1.3:1

improved

37:1

 

 

 

 

 

Teen Females

13:0:0

13:0

improved

13:0

All non-residents

6:1:3

2:1

improved

2:1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Details:

 

 

Improved Chances of Getting Laid

No Change

 

Reduced Chances of Getting Laid

Number of Voters

Number of Abstainers

All Voters

61

51

1

113

23

All Males

24

21

0

45

8

All Females

37

28

1

66

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teen Females

13

0

0

13

0

All non-residents

6

1

3

10

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of the 113 Voters who responded:

 

54%

Improved Chances of Getting Laid

45%

No Chance in the Chances of Getting Laid

1%

Reduced Chances of Getting Laid

 

If we exclude the ‘no change’ category:

of the 62 people who voted Improved Chances or Reduced Chances:

 

98%

Improved Chances of Getting Laid

2%

(±12%, 19 times out of 20)

Reduced Chances of Getting Laid

 

If we exclude the ‘Reduced Chances’ category:

of the 112 people who voted ‘Improved Chances’ or ‘No Change’:

 

54%

Improved Chances of Getting Laid

46%*

(±9.2%, 19 times out of 20)

(*the difference between these two numbers is not statistically significant. See ‘Calculation of Margin of Error Section’)

 

No Change in the Chances of Getting Laid

 


 

Graph 17f-A

Graph 17f-B


 

Graph 17f-C

Graph 17f-D


 

 

Graph 17f-E

 

Graph 17f-F

Age Category

 

Number who voted in Proposition:17f

(Males+Females)

15-17

13

18s

5

19s

6

20s

36

26s

9

30s

19

40s

23

50s

10

60s

6

70s

2

 

 

 

 

Results:

            Improved Chances of Getting Laid:                 61 vote

            No Change in the Chances of Getting Laid:   51 vote

            Reduced Chances of Getting Laid:                     1 vote

 

Calculation of Margin of Error:

 

Comparing ‘Improved Chances of Getting Laid’ vs. ‘No Change in the Chances of Getting Laid’:

 

            Improved Chances of Getting Laid:                 61 vote

            No Change in the Chances of Getting Laid:   51 vote

n=113

            Using our formula: Margin of Error = ±9.2%

 

 

Improved Chances: 61 vote±9.2%=61 votes±5.6 votes  = a range of 55.4 to 66.6

No change: 51 votes±9.2% = 51 votes ±4.5 votes = a range of 46.5 to 55.5

 

            Because the ranges overlap, the difference between the two numbers is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. If a vote of the general Community were taken, we could not determine if it would yield a majority vote for either the ‘Improved category’ or the ‘No Change’ category. It is obvious though, that the difference between these two categories and the ‘Less Chance of Getting Laid’ category is statistically significant.

             In summary, then, the Community does not believe that there would be a reduced chance of getting laid if the town implemented a tops-free policy for all swimming areas.

The Community does believe that there would be either ‘improved chances of getting laid’ or ‘no chance in the chances of getting laid’.

 

 

Discussion of Results:

 

 

            Both males and females in the over-thirty age category voted, majority: ‘no change’. Other age categories, voted: ‘improved chances’.

            There appears to be an age-effect in this proposition for both males and females. In Graph 17f-E, we can see that, below age 50, generally, the younger the age of the voter, the greater percentage voted ‘Improved chances of getting laid’. After age 50, the rates raised again but the number of voters in the 70 age group are small so that data point may or may not be significant. The age effect may or may not be significant because the number of voters in each age category are small.

            Graph 17f-F shows that the peak age of the percent of people who voted ‘No Change’ is about 35 years old.

 

 

 


 

Comments Section:

 

 

Community Standards Vote 2008

 

Ifs/ands/buts/comments on the following proposition: 17. If Sylvan Lake Public swimming areas became ‘tops optional’, the consequences would be:

 [6  sub-questions dealing with:

 a. tourism,

b. business activity,

c. property values,

d. family life,

e. community pride,

f. chances of getting laid.]

 

[Comments are typed as the various authors wrote them with no correction of spelling or editing.  Editors notes are placed within square brackets.]

 

[legend: M=male, F=female, number is age, X=not specified.]

 

 

1.

F20-25  

When change occurs it often takes time for societies to adjust.

2.

F19

 f. haha!

5.

F30s 

 f. This question is totally unnecessary.

6.

F40s  

Unable to determine – there would likely be initial shock reactions, either negative or positive, but as withmost things, changes become integrated.

7.

F50s  

Wouldn’t come at all – you figure answer out.

8.

F20-25  

17f is pretty funny.

9.

M20-25  

 f. Half the work is already done!

 

 

- end of proposition 17f -

 

Home  |   Short Summary  |  Site Map   |  Links